Drug Database
BE

bevacizumab (BP 01 / Bevqolva / BP01)

✓ Approved

Aurobindo Pharma Limited · VEGFA · Monoclonal Antibodies

What is bevacizumab?

bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibodies developed by Aurobindo Pharma Limited. It is approved for therapeutic indications via injectable (others) or intravenous (iv).

Drug Profile

Brand NamesBP 01, Bevqolva, BP01
CompanyAurobindo Pharma Limited
Drug ClassMonoclonal Antibodies, Antibody
Molecular TargetVEGFA
RouteInjectable (Others), Intravenous (IV)
StatusApproved

Mechanism of Action

Molecular Targets

bevacizumab acts on 1 molecular target:

VEGFAvascular endothelial growth factor A (VPF, MVCD1)
Want deeper analysis?Noah AI can explain complex mechanisms and compare to similar drugs.

Therapeutic Indications

bevacizumab is developed for 9 unique indications across 2 therapeutic areas.

Therapeutic AreaConditionPhase
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Non-small cell lung cancer stage IV✓ Approved
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Non-small cell lung cancer metastatic✓ Approved
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Ovarian cancer✓ Approved
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Renal cancer✓ Approved
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Colorectal cancer✓ Approved

+4 more indications available with a free account

Sign up free to view all indications →

Related Research Articles

PubMedJournal of translational autoimmunity2026-08-30

Immune dysregulation in osteoarthritis: Mechanisms, biomarkers, and therapeutic opportunities.

Enteshari-Moghaddam Afsaneh A, Khorramdelazad Hossein H, Abbasifard Mitra M

Osteoarthritis (OA) is increasingly recognized as a heterogeneous, immune-modulated joint disease in which chronic low-grade synovial inflammation contributes to structural degeneration and pain, challenging its historical classification as a purely mechanical disorder. Central to this paradigm shift is the recognition that synovial immune activation, particularly macrophage-driven inflammatory programs, is a key axis linking tissue damage to nociception and interacting with complementary inflammatory networks that collectively shape disease progression. However, translating these mechanistic insights into effective disease-modifying therapies has remained limited, with biologics targeting individual inflammatory mediators yielding inconsistent clinical benefit, thereby exposing a fundamental disconnect between molecular stratification and therapeutic response. This disconnect reflects the pronounced biological heterogeneity of OA, in which inflammatory activity is neither uniform nor temporally stable across disease stages. Emerging evidence supports the existence of distinct immunopathological endotypes, yet current therapeutic strategies remain largely unstratified and fail to account for this variability. Parallel advances in synovial biology and systems-level profiling have expanded the conceptual framework beyond single-cell pathways to encompass integrated immune-stromal interactions, but these insights have not yet translated into robust clinical decision-support tools. Therapeutically, multiple immune-modulatory approaches, including macrophage reprogramming, broader pathway modulation, and cellular or senescence-targeting strategies, have shown preclinical promise but remain constrained by limited clinical validation and inadequate patient selection frameworks. Across these approaches, a consistent barrier is the lack of reliable, reproducible biomarkers that link immunological heterogeneity to clinically actionable stratification. This review synthesizes current understanding of immune-driven mechanisms in OA, evaluates the translational performance of immunomodulatory interventions, and critically examines the limitations of existing biomarker strategies. It highlights the need for an integrated framework that links synovial immunobiology to endotype-specific patient classification, arguing that biomarker-guided stratification is a prerequisite for achieving precision immunomodulation and meaningful disease modification in OA.

PubMedAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2026-08-29

Advanced Materials for Biologics Delivery to Brain Tumors.

Feng Yuran Y, Cao Yuxue Y, Kavallaris Maria M, Janjua Taskeen T et al.

Brain cancer remains a major global health challenge due to its high morbidity and mortality. Current standard therapies are often limited by incomplete tumor resection, systemic toxicity, and the inability to effectively penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which restricts drug delivery to the tumor site. These challenges underscore the urgent need for innovative therapeutic strategies that can overcome these barriers and improve treatment outcomes. Biological materials encompass a diverse range of molecules, from small peptides to monoclonal antibodies, either derived from living organisms or synthetically synthesized. Unlike traditional therapies, biologics provide a more targeted approach, including specific tumor targeting, immune system modulation, and regenerating damaged cells. Although biologics offer significant promise for brain cancer treatment, major challenges associated with blood-brain and tumour barriers continue to limit their translation, and comprehensive reviews bridging therapeutic advances with delivery technologies remain scarce. While individual biologic classes have been extensively studied, a unified assessment of these modalities and their delivery optimization is still needed. This review addresses the current gap by critically examining recent advances in biologic therapies and evaluating emerging invasive and non-invasive delivery strategies to enhance their therapeutic efficacy in brain cancer.

PubMedClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2026-08-29

From Barrier Disruption and Immune Dysregulation to Targeted Therapies in Atopic Dermatitis.

Luo Xin X, Li Yichuan Y, Feng Yinyi Y, Wang Ying Y et al.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a heterogeneous inflammatory skin disorder characterized by recurrent eczematous lesions and persistent pruritus. Its pathogenesis involves epidermal barrier dysfunction, immune dysregulation, microbial dysbiosis, and altered neuroimmune signaling. Genetic defects in structural proteins, particularly filaggrin, and altered epidermal lipids increase allergen and microbial penetration, perpetuating itch, scratching, tissue injury, and inflammation. Molecular evidence further reveals AD endotypes beyond conventional clinical phenotypes, with heterogeneity in immune polarization, barrier dysfunction, microbial colonization, and pruritic pathways. This heterogeneity may underlie differences in clinical presentation and treatment response. Conventional treatments, including skin hydration, antihistamines, and topical anti-inflammatory agents, often provide incomplete or transient control. Mechanism-based therapies targeting IL-4/IL-13, OX40/OX40L, JAK, and PDE4, together with AhR agonists, have broadened treatment options. However, efficacy must be balanced against treatment-specific risks. Biologics require monitoring for ocular and injection-site reactions, whereas systemic JAK inhibitors require monitoring for infections and laboratory abnormalities and carry regulatory class warnings regarding major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism, and malignancy; however, these warnings are largely extrapolated from studies in older patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and the magnitude of these risks in patients with AD remains uncertain. Long-term safety and real-world evidence remain limited for several emerging therapies. This review synthesizes current knowledge of barrier dysfunction, immune heterogeneity, molecular endotypes, microbiome imbalance, neuroimmune signaling, and mechanism-based therapies. Integrating clinical phenotypes with molecular endotypes, predictive biomarkers, efficacy, and individualized safety assessment may enable more precise treatment selection and durable disease control.

PubMedAnais brasileiros de dermatologia2026-08-29

Clinical practice guideline for psoriasis management in Latin America.

Valenzuela Fernando F, Castro Ayarza Juan Raúl JR, Kaplan Débora D, Londoño-García Angela María AM et al.

Psoriasis care in Latin America is heterogeneous, and access to systemic agents, biologics, phototherapy, and monitoring resources varies widely across countries. To develop a regional, evidence-based clinical practice guideline for psoriasis management using GRADE methodology. The Latin American Psoriasis Society (SOLAPSO) convened a guideline development group, an extended expert panel, patients, and an independent methodological team. We framed clinical questions using PICO, conducted systematic literature reviews, rated certainty of evidence with GRADE, and formulated recommendations through structured Evidence-to-Decision deliberations incorporating benefits and harms, patient values, feasibility, equity, and resource use. Independent external reviewers assessed clarity and methodological quality. The guideline provides measurable therapeutic targets for plaque psoriasis and key phenotypes, including nail psoriasis, generalized pustular psoriasis, and other special forms. It recommends first-line conventional systemic options (methotrexate, cyclosporine, acitretin) and phototherapy, and it defines indications for escalation to biologic agents or small molecules after inadequate response, intolerance, or contraindications to conventional therapy. It addresses selection across biologic classes, use of biosimilars, and strategies for primary and secondary therapeutic failure. Additional recommendations cover high-impact areas (scalp, nails, palmoplantar, inverse, genital) and special situations (pregnancy, cancer, chronic viral infections, HIV, latent tuberculosis, pediatric psoriasis), plus nonpharmacologic interventions (weight reduction and structured psychological support). Limitations include heterogeneity in the availability of regional evidence, indirect evidence for some special populations, and variability in access to therapies across Latin American health systems. This guideline offers an actionable framework for comprehensive psoriasis care in Latin America, balancing best available evidence with regional constraints to support equitable, patient-centered implementation in routine clinical practice.

PubMedGynecologic oncology2026-08-29

High rates of venous thromboembolism in endometrial cancer patients requiring systemic therapy: an opportunity for risk assessment and intervention.

Thayer Elizabeth G EG, Roecker Zoe A ZA, Roof Kelsey A KA, Gold Hannah B HB et al.

We aim to describe the venous thromboembolism (VTE) rate among patients who received chemotherapy for initial endometrial cancer treatment, and identify factors associated with VTE diagnosis in this population. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who received chemotherapy during initial treatment for endometrial cancer from January 2015 to December 2023 within a single academic medical system. The primary outcome is overall VTE incidence. Sociodemographic and biomedical factors were collected. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Two hundred ninety-two patients were identified who received chemotherapy during initial treatment for endometrial cancer; 78 (26.7%) developed a VTE after cancer diagnosis. Cancer stage was associated with VTE development (p < 0.001); 50.0% of patients who developed VTE had Stage IV at diagnosis compared to 20.4% of those who did not. Twenty-four patients (30.8%) had carcinomatosis at the time of VTE diagnosis and 14 (17.9%) had ascites. A high-risk Khorana score (≥3) at initiation of initial chemotherapy, histology, grade, age, ECOG functional status, tobacco use, body mass index, and receipt of external beam pelvic radiation, immunotherapy, or bevacizumab during initial treatment were not associated with VTE development. More than 1 in 4 patients who received chemotherapy for initial endometrial cancer developed a VTE during their treatment course. Stage at cancer diagnosis was the only factor associated with subsequent VTE; factors including histology, grade, BMI and Khorana score were not associated. As endometrial cancer incidence rises, continued efforts to improve the accuracy of risk assessment tools and evaluate prophylactic anticoagulation in this high-risk population are warranted.

PubMedACR open rheumatology2026-08-29

Reduction of CXCR3+CCR6+ CD4+ T Cells and IL-17+ RORγt+ CD4+ T Cells During Secukinumab Treatment Identifies Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis Responsive to Subsequent Biologic Therapy.

Pacheco Addison A, Remalante-Rayco Patricia P, Haroon Nigil N, Poddubnyy Denis D et al.

We recently reported an immune profile that stratifies patients with axial spondyloarthritis based on clinical response to secukinumab. We now undertake an exploratory study on the secukinumab nonresponder patients to determine if immunologic changes occur during their initial secukinumab treatment that could determine their next biologic response. At the clinician's discretion, 18 patients who did not respond to secukinumab were either switched to a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi; n = 8) or underwent secukinumab dose escalation to 300 mg monthly or 150 mg biweekly (n = 10). Flow cytometry-derived immune cell subset frequencies and NanoString gene expression profiling of CD45RO+CD45RA-CD4+ T cells obtained during initial secukinumab treatment were stratified and reanalyzed according to subsequent treatment response based on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index at week 24. Most patients were either subsequent secukinumab responders (sSecu-Rs; n = 5/10, 50%) or subsequent TNFi responders (sTNFi-Rs; n = 6/8, 75%). During the initial secukinumab treatment, there was a significant decrease in the frequency of TH17.1 cells (P < 0.05) and interleukin-17 positive (IL17+) RORγt+ CD4+ T cells (P < 0.05) in sSecu-Rs and sTNFi-Rs, but not in patients who failed all three biologics (subsequent non responder [sNR]). Multidimensional scaling of NanoString data revealed that subsequent nonresponders (sNRs; before and after secukinumab) clustered distinctly from other groups. Following the initial secukinumab therapy, but not before it, sSecu-Rs and sTNFi-Rs showed lower expression of IL12A, IL12RB1, IFNGR1, and JAK1 compared with sNRs. Secukinumab treatment induces immunologic changes associated with reduced inflammation, even in patients who demonstrate an inadequate clinical response. Notably, patients who display these immunologic profiles are more likely to respond to subsequent biologic therapy.

+9996 more articles available with a free account

Sign up free to view all articles →

Ask about bevacizumab