Drug Database
GR

granulocyte colony stimulating factor (Hebervital)

✓ Approved

Heber Biotec · CSF3 · Recombinant Proteins

What is granulocyte colony stimulating factor?

granulocyte colony stimulating factor is a recombinant proteins developed by Heber Biotec. It is approved for therapeutic indications via injectable (others).

Drug Profile

Brand NamesHebervital
CompanyHeber Biotec
Drug ClassRecombinant Proteins
Molecular TargetCSF3
RouteInjectable (Others)
StatusApproved

Mechanism of Action

Molecular Targets

granulocyte colony stimulating factor acts on 1 molecular target:

CSF3colony stimulating factor 3 (GCSF, CSF3OS)
Want deeper analysis?Noah AI can explain complex mechanisms and compare to similar drugs.

Therapeutic Indications

granulocyte colony stimulating factor is developed for 2 unique indications across 1 therapeutic area.

Therapeutic AreaConditionPhase
Blood and lymphatic system disordersNeutropenia✓ Approved
Blood and lymphatic system disordersBone marrow disorder✓ Approved

Related Research Articles

PubMedMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026-10-16

Small-Molecule Drugs Approved by the FDA in 2025.

Wang Xiaoyue X, Wang Ying Y, Luo Rui R, Niu Donghai D et al.

In today's pharmaceutical sector, innovation is not only the core driver of industry upgrading, but also closely tied to patient health and well-being. A drug's innovative mechanism of action, physiological effects, chemical structure, and indications collectively reflect both its clinical therapeutic value and the novelty of underlying basic research. This article presents the innovative advances of 31 small-molecule drugs (accounting for 67.4%) approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2025. These therapeutics span multiple therapeutic areas, including oncology, autoimmune diseases, infectious diseases, cardiovascular disorders, and metabolic conditions, and target a diverse array of molecular targets such as mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases 1 and 2 (MEK1/2), colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor, protein tyrosine kinase Tec, and Bruton tyrosine kinase, among others. Among these approved small-molecule drugs, 13 are designated as "first-in-class" therapies, reflecting the continuous innovation in the field of new drug development. Notably, many of these drugs (e.g., Journavx, Brinsupri, Jascayd, and Kygevvi) have also been granted breakthrough therapy designation, which underscores that they not only feature novel mechanisms of action, but also deliver clinically meaningful efficacy advantages over prior therapeutic options. Notably, in 2025, the FDA approved sunvozertinib, a novel small-molecule drug independently developed by Dizal (Jiangsu, China) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., for locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations, contributing Chinese wisdom and solutions to the transformative evolution of global drug development paradigms. Cross-technology integration, long-acting drug delivery, and precision medicine stand as core industrial trends, enabling innovative drugs to boost therapeutic efficacy, mitigate toxic side effects and refine patients' medical experience, offering patients expanded regimens for improved survival outcomes. With the development of first-in-class drugs, therapies targeting previously undruggable targets-or those inaccessible via conventional approaches-are entering clinical practice, creating major opportunities for novel, mechanism-based drug discovery. This article comprehensively analyzes the mechanisms of action, synthesis methods, and clinical trials of these drugs chronologically, and delineates emerging trends in novel drug development.

PubMedInternational journal of molecular sciences2026-10-16

Associations of Serum Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein with Body Composition and Hematological Inflammatory Indices in Postmenopausal Women.

Wojciechowski Michał M, Nowak Alicja A, Ogurkowska Małgorzata M, Podgórski Tomasz T et al.

In the postmenopausal period, a decrease in sex hormone levels may alter body composition and can predispose individuals to increased body fat and musculoskeletal tissue degeneration, including a deterioration in the articular cartilage. The aim of the study was to assess the resting serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) concentrations in postmenopausal women with different body mass indexes (BMIs) and how COMP correlates with both lean and fat mass as well as with blood count-derived inflammatory markers. Thirty-three postmenopausal women were included in the study. Total fat and lean body mass were measured via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Blood serum concentrations of COMP and adiponectin were assessed, and lymphocyte, monocyte and granulocyte counts were determined. The lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) and granulocyte-to-lymphocyte (GLR) ratios were calculated. The analysis of differences in body mass, BMI, lean body mass, fat mass, and android (p ≤ 0.01) and gynoid fat mass (p < 0.05) revealed significantly lower values in the group of women with a normal BMI compared to the group with a BMI above the normal range. In the group of women with a normal BMI, a significant relationship was noted between COMP and lean body mass (p ≤ 0.01). In the group of women with a BMI above the normal range, a significant positive correlation of COMP with LMR (p < 0.05) and a negative correlation with GLR (p < 0.05) were observed. The significant associations between resting serum COMP levels and lean body mass and inflammatory markers, which varied according to BMI categories, suggest that body composition may be an important factor to consider when using COMP for diagnostic purposes.

PubMedAsia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology2026-10-16

Efficacy and Safety of CSF1R Inhibitors for Recurrent or Unresectable Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Phase III Randomized Controlled Trials.

Ahmad Mehmood M, Farhan Kanza K, Khan Anwar Ali AA, Amir Hanzala H et al.

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a rare, locally aggressive neoplasm driven by overexpression of colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1). We performed a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of CSF1 receptor inhibitors (CSF1Ri) versus placebo in recurrent or unresectable TGCT, defined as symptomatic disease for which surgery would cause worsening functional limitation or severe morbidity. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, CENTRAL, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were searched from inception to March 25, 2026 for phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any CSF1Ri with placebo in adults with histologically confirmed TGCT. The primary outcome was objective response rate (ORR); secondary outcomes were physical function (PROMIS-PF), range of motion (ROM), pain, health-related quality of life (EQ-VAS), and Grade 3 or higher adverse events. Risk of bias (RoB 2) and certainty (GRADE) were assessed; estimates were pooled using random-effects models (RevMan 5.4.1), with fixed-effect, Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman, risk-difference, and leave-one-out sensitivity analyses. Three RCTs were included (ENLIVEN, MOTION, MANEUVER; n = 337), all at low risk of bias. CSF1Ri significantly improved ORR (RR 25.55 [95% CI 6.43-101.52]; risk difference 0.43 [0.36-0.50]), PROMIS-PF (MD 3.81 [2.28-5.34]), relative ROM (MD 11.43 [6.53-16.34] percentage points), and EQ-VAS (MD 7.63 [4.03-11.23]) (all I2 = 0%, p < 0.001), and reduced pain (SMD -1.03 [-1.65 to -0.42]; p = 0.0009; I2 = 76%). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were more frequent with CSF1Ri (RR 4.08 [2.31-7.21]; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%). Certainty was high for functional outcomes, moderate for ORR and Grade 3 or higher adverse events, and low for pain. In recurrent or unresectable TGCT, CSF1Ri produce clinically meaningful improvements in tumor response, function, and quality of life compared with placebo, at the cost of more frequent severe adverse events, the nature of which differed between trials. The included trials did not compare agents directly, so the relative efficacy and safety of individual CSF1Ri remain uncertain.

PubMedOncology reports2026-10-16

PBRM1 knockdown is associated with NRF2‑dependent ALDOA upregulation and metabolic reprogramming in HCCC‑9810 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cells.

Zhang Dong D, Liu Dezheng D, Yang Shukuan S, Zhao Zijian Z et al.

Polybromo‑1 (PBRM1) is a chromatin‑remodeling factor that is altered in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The present study examined the effects of PBRM1 knockdown on tumor‑related phenotypes and glucose metabolism in HCCC‑9810 ICC cells. The present study also evaluated the roles of aldolase, fructose‑bisphosphate A (ALDOA) and nuclear factor erythroid 2‑related factor 2 (NRF2). Publicly available ICC mutation data were analyzed descriptively. The present study evaluated HCCC‑9810 cells following PBRM1 knockdown using proliferation, colony formation, wound‑healing, Transwell, metabolic, reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR, western blotting, apoptosis and mitochondrial membrane‑potential assays. ALDOA and NRF2 perturbation experiments were used to examine their contribution to the PBRM1‑knockdown phenotype. HCCC‑9810‑derived xenografts were used for in vivo assessment. PBRM1 knockdown increased proliferation, migration and invasion in HCCC‑9810 cells and altered several glucose‑metabolism readouts. ALDOA expression also increased following PBRM1 knockdown. ALDOA silencing attenuated several metabolic and survival‑related changes. NRF2 overexpression increased ALDOA expression, whereas NRF2 knockdown reduced it. Co‑silencing NRF2 attenuated the ALDOA increase associated with PBRM1 knockdown. In xenografts, PBRM1 knockdown was associated with greater tumor growth, higher ALDOA expression and a higher Ki67 signal. PBRM1 knockdown was associated with a tumor‑promoting metabolic phenotype in HCCC‑9810 cells, with ALDOA contributing to several metabolic and survival‑related changes. NRF2 perturbation further supported an NRF2‑dependent component of ALDOA regulation in this HCCC‑9810 model; however, the upstream mechanism responsible for increased NRF2 after PBRM1 knockdown remains unresolved. These findings warrant validation in independent ICC models.

PubMedThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2026-10-16

Allogeneic Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Accelerate Diabetic Wound Healing via Inflammation Suppression and Angiogenesis Promotion: A Preclinical Study.

Chen Rong-Fu RF, Liu Keng-Fan KF, Lee Chia-Chun CC, Chen Yu-Han YH et al.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been shown to enhance tissue regeneration and wound healing. This preclinical study investigated the therapeutic potential of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBM-MSCs) for accelerating diabetic wound healing. Isolated hBM-MSCs were characterized for surface marker expression and differentiation potential. Their migration-promoting effects were evaluated in vitro. For the in vivo study, a dorsal skin defect model was created in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats. Rats received periwound subcutaneous injections of low- or high-dose hBM-MSCs on Days 4 and 7, or freezing fluid as a vehicle control. Wound healing progression was assessed clinically, and tissue biopsies were analyzed using immunohistochemistry to evaluate inflammatory cell infiltration, cellular proliferation, and angiogenesis. hBM-MSCs exhibited the expected surface marker profile and multilineage differentiation potential. In vitro, hBM-MSCs significantly enhanced the migration of human umbilical vein endothelial cells and human foreskin fibroblasts. In vivo, wounds treated with hBM-MSCs showed significantly accelerated healing compared to vehicle-treated controls (p < 0.05). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed reduced inflammatory cell infiltration and increased expression of Ki-67, epidermal growth factor (EGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and prolyl 4-hydroxylase (P4H) in hBM-MSC-treated wounds. Allogeneic hBM-MSCs significantly promote diabetic wound healing by suppressing inflammation, enhancing cellular proliferation and differentiation, and stimulating angiogenesis. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of allogeneic hBM-MSCs for treating diabetic wounds, particularly in patients unsuitable for autologous cell therapy.

PubMedInternational journal of molecular sciences2026-10-16

Intraosseous Lidocaine Trigger Point Injection for Vertebrogenic Pain: From Molecular Principles to Clinical Applications: A Narrative Review.

Al-Zamil Mustafa M, Shnayder Natalia A NA, Petrova Marina M MM, Naprienko Margarita V MV et al.

Intraosseous lidocaine trigger point injection (LTPI) has been utilized for an extended period in the management of chronic vertebrogenic pain; yet, its molecular mechanisms and clinical efficacy require critical appraisal. This narrative review highlights the milestones of osteoreception and elucidates the molecular mechanisms driving intraosseous receptor irritation and its pivotal role in chronic pain development. Pathological vertebral bone remodeling triggers a receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand/osteoprotegerin (RANKL/OPG) imbalance, accelerating hyperactive osteoclastogenesis. Enhanced osteoclastic vacuolar-type H+-ATPase (V-ATPase) expression drives microenvironment acidity and intraosseous hypertension, persistently stimulating acid-sensing ion channel 3 (ASIC3) and purinergic P2X2/3 receptors on intraosseous afferents. Concurrently, upregulated nerve growth factor (NGF) binds to tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TrkA), driving peripheral sensitization via transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) phosphorylation. The available clinical studies investigating intraosseous LTPI for vertebrogenic pain are scarce and heterogeneous, focusing primarily on low back pain, cervicalgia, and residual chronic pain after degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis decompression surgery. The reviewed data provide preliminary signals of potential benefit, observing a statistically significant analgesic effect of intraosseous LTPI within the studied cohorts. In two trials comparing it to intramuscular LTPI, one of which utilized a randomized controlled design, the intraosseous approach was reported to provide more pronounced short-term pain relief. However, these trials are limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneous designs, and a lack of active long-term safety monitoring. Nevertheless, although current data provide promising but still limited insights, future double-blinded, multicenter randomized controlled trials are required to comprehensively establish the clinical efficacy, safety profile, and prolonged effect of intraosseous LTPI in the treatment of vertebrogenic pain.

+9996 more articles available with a free account

Sign up free to view all articles →

Ask about granulocyte colony stimulating factor