Drug Database
SU

sublingual immunotherapy

✓ Approved

Anallergo · therapeutic agent

What is sublingual immunotherapy?

sublingual immunotherapy is a therapeutic agent developed by Anallergo. It is approved for therapeutic indications via oral (po) or sublingual (sl)/oral transmucosal.

Drug Profile

CompanyAnallergo
RouteOral (PO), Sublingual (SL)/Oral Transmucosal
StatusApproved

Therapeutic Indications

sublingual immunotherapy is developed for 1 unique indication across 1 therapeutic area.

Therapeutic AreaConditionPhase
Immune system disordersHypersensitivity✓ Approved

Related Research Articles

PubMedNature immunology2026-10-15

Compartment-specific PPARδ activity controls the outcome of cancer-immune cell competition and immunotherapy efficacy.

Bunk Paul P, Ergin Ilgin I, Maher Timothy T, Shah Vyom V et al.

Most patients with solid tumors fail to sustain antitumor immunity, in part because immune cells cannot outcompete cancer cells inside the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Here, we show the lipid-sensing transcription factor PPARδ is a compartment-specific determinant of cancer-immune fitness balance and immunotherapy efficacy. Activating PPARδ in cancer cells promotes their growth and impairs antitumor immunity, whereas activating it in immune cells drives tumor suppression and overrides tumor-promoting effects of cancer-intrinsic activation. Mechanistically, PPARδ enhances CD8+ T cell fitness against cancer through effector-associated chromatin remodeling and Cpt1a-mediated fatty acid oxidation. Therapeutically, PPARδ-activated CD8+ T cells sensitize immunotherapy-resistant microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer to checkpoint blockade in mice, and pharmacological or genetic PPARδ activation enhances human chimeric antigen receptor T cell function. These findings identify compartment-specific PPARδ activity as a targetable driver of immune cell fitness that can be harnessed to improve outcomes in immunotherapy-resistant tumors.

PubMedThe oncologist2026-10-15

Correction: Linking early and late endpoints in adjuvant immunotherapy trials: an evaluation of multiple clinical outcomes.

PubMedFrontiers in immunology2026-10-15

Global trends and knowledge evolution of tertiary lymphoid structures in cancer immunotherapy: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.

Li Yanan Y, Cao Zhi Z, Zhou Jingru J, Zhang Yang Y et al.

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) are ectopic immune aggregates that arise in non-lymphoid tissues during chronic inflammation, including cancer. Their reported associations with antitumor immunity and immune-checkpoint blockade have prompted rapid growth of the field. We therefore mapped the literature on TLSs in cancer immunotherapy over the prespecified period from January 1, 2000 through March 31, 2026. The primary bibliometric corpus comprised 1,373 English-language articles and reviews from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). PubMed and Scopus were searched independently for descriptive comparison and were not merged with the WoSCC corpus. Analyses used bibliometrix, VOSviewer, CiteSpace, SCImago Graphica, and Microsoft Excel. Publication output rose markedly after 2019 and reached 315 publications in 2025. China, the United States, and France were the leading corresponding-author countries/regions, while INSERM, Sun Yat-sen University, and Fudan University led the distinct-document institutional count. Major mapped themes included B cells, immune-checkpoint blockade, spatial pathology, prognostic modeling, the tumor microenvironment, lymphatic vessels, and high endothelial venules. The independently retrieved PubMed and Scopus datasets showed broadly similar aggregate temporal and title/abstract term profiles. The analysis describes the growth, collaboration structure, and thematic development of TLS research in cancer immunotherapy. These bibliometric patterns indicate research attention; they do not establish biological mechanisms, biomarker performance, therapeutic efficacy, or clinical utility.

PubMedFrontiers in immunology2026-10-15

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors after first- and second-line immunotherapy in a cohort of 57 patients with refractory autoimmune encephalitis.

He Jiao J, Lu Haozhe H

Refractory autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a severe condition with limited real-world evidence on treatment outcomes and prognostic factors. This study evaluated clinical outcomes and factors associated with 6-month functional recovery in a strictly defined refractory AE cohort. This single-center retrospective cohort study screened 246 potentially eligible AE records from 2018 to 2025 and included 57 patients who fulfilled the prespecified refractory AE criteria and had ascertainable 6-month functional outcomes. Second-line immunotherapy was subsequently administered to a subset of patients. The primary outcome was 6-month functional status assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) after refractory-state adjudication, with favorable outcome defined as mRS 0-2. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for baseline severity and constrained by the limited number of unfavorable outcomes, examined factors associated with 6-month functional outcome. All 57 patients fulfilled the harmonized refractory criterion after inadequate response to first-line immunotherapy. Second-line escalation was subsequently administered to 14 patients (24.6%), whereas 43 (75.4%) did not receive second-line therapy. Favorable 6-month outcomes occurred in 9/14 (64.3%) and 28/43 (65.1%), respectively. In the parsimonious multivariable analysis, higher mRS at refractory-state adjudication and ICU admission were associated with unfavorable 6-month functional outcome. The association with ICU admission persisted after adjustment for mRS, but its magnitude was imprecisely estimated and likely overlaps with the underlying construct of disease severity. These findings should therefore be considered exploratory prognostic associations rather than definitive independent predictors.

PubMedFrontiers in oncology2026-10-15

A novel multimodal model integrating CT-based deep learning and clinical information for predicting 1-year OS of first-line immunotherapy in ES-SCLC patients.

Zhang Jing J, Gu Liwen L, Dong Peixin P, Hu Yu Y et al.

Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is a rare yet highly aggressive malignancy with severely limited treatment options. The efficacy of immunotherapy for ES-SCLC remain limited, with only 14% of patients deriving additional benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), underscoring significant heterogeneity in patient response. This study aimed to develop a model for the accurate prediction of prognosis and therapeutic response to optimize treatment strategies. 99 and 25 ES-SCLC patients were enrolled as training and independent internal validation cohorts. Baseline CT images, clinical data, and laboratory markers were collected. Prognostic factors were screened via Cox regression. A mediastinal window CT-based deep learning model (MWDL) was developed and combined with Progastrin-releasing peptide (log(ProGRP + 1)) and bone metastasis to establish the novel MWGB-Cox model. ProGRP and bone metastasis were independent prognostic factors with area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.705 and 0.666 respectively for predicting 1-year OS. Among the pure deep learning models, the MWDL model achieved better performance with a mean AUC of 0.813 than the deep learning model based on lung window CT images (LWDL, AUC 0.756). Whereas the multimodal MWGB-Cox model not only achieved the highest AUC (0.902) for 1-year OS prediction, but also effectively overcame the limitation of insufficient sensitivity. The predictive performance of the MWGB-Cox model was further validated in the independent internal validation cohort. This novel, simple, and cost-effective multimodal MWGB-Cox model integrating CT-based deep learning, log(ProGRP + 1), and bone metastasis could robustly predict 1-year OS of ES-SCLC patients receiving first-line immunotherapy, providing a reliable tool for clinical decision-making. By integrating CT-based deep learning, log(ProGRP + 1) levels, and bone metastasis, the novel multimodal model achieved the highest predictive AUC (0.902) with improved sensitivity, serving as a simple, cost-effective tool for clinical decision-making.

PubMedPediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology2026-10-15

International survey of parental and patient perspectives on emerging adrenaline devices for community-based management of anaphylaxis: An EAACI task force report.

Gonzalez-Matamala M F MF, Patel N N, Kahn-Santoro D D, Knibb R R et al.

Intranasal adrenaline has been approved in multiple countries for anaphylaxis treatment, based primarily on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic comparisons to adrenaline autoinjectors (AAIs). To assess patient and caregiver perspectives regarding emerging non-injectable adrenaline routes. Online survey of adults and caregivers of children with food allergy prescribed AAIs, with international dissemination supported by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (February-April 2025). We analyzed 542 responses from caregivers and 224 from adults with food allergy. Effectiveness of adrenaline nasal spray (ANS) compared to AAI was rated "extremely important" by 78% of caregivers and 71% of adults. 48% of caregivers and 42% of adults were "extremely worried" that ANS may not work as well as AAI, and 50% and 44% (respectively) that it may not work well enough. Compared with AAI, respondents were less worried about ANS being painful or difficult to carry, and about fear/embarrassment around use, but more worried about side effects and knowing how to use it. Most anticipated being more comfortable using ANS than AAI, and over half anticipated earlier use during anaphylaxis. Only 17.2% of caregivers and 23.2% of adults preferred to be prescribed ANS only. There was interest in sublingual adrenaline due to portability and reduced needle-related burden, but confidence depended on comparable speed/effectiveness and feasibility during reactions. Non-injectable adrenaline is attractive to caregivers and adults, and may improve willingness to carry and use adrenaline. However, demand for evidence of effectiveness, safety, and real-world feasibility is high, highlighting important information needs for shared decision-making.

+9996 more articles available with a free account

Sign up free to view all articles →

Ask about sublingual immunotherapy