Praxis' Vormatrigine Shows Promising Results in Mid-Stage Epilepsy Trial

Praxis Precision Medicines has reported encouraging results from its Phase II RADIANT trial of vormatrigine, a novel sodium channel blocker, for the treatment of focal onset seizures. The study demonstrated a significant reduction in seizure frequency, positioning the drug as a potential competitor in the epilepsy market.
Efficacy and Safety Profile
Vormatrigine, an investigational small-molecule drug, achieved a median 56.3% decrease in seizure frequency over eight weeks of treatment. Notably, 22% of treated patients experienced complete seizure cessation during the last 28 days of the trial. The drug's rapid onset of action was evident, with more than 54% of participants achieving a 50% reduction in seizures within the first week.
The efficacy results are particularly impressive given that vormatrigine outperformed its closest competitors. SK Life Science's Xcopri and Xenon Pharmaceuticals' XEN-1101 have reported seizure frequency reductions of 55.6% and 52.8%, respectively.
Despite the positive efficacy data, the RADIANT study faced a 23% patient discontinuation rate. Praxis attributed many of these dropouts to a lack of background therapy dose adjustment, noting that adverse events and discontinuations were avoided in instances where investigators proactively reduced background treatment.
Market Implications and Future Plans
The strong performance of vormatrigine has bolstered Praxis' position in the competitive epilepsy drug market. Analysts at Truist Securities referred to the readout as "impressive," highlighting the drug's efficacy and relatively clean safety profile. They also noted the potential for broad utilization, given that vormatrigine targets sodium channels, a first-line target for epilepsy treatment.
Praxis is advancing its clinical program for vormatrigine with two ongoing Phase II/III studies, POWER1 and POWER2, in focal onset seizures. POWER1 is expected to be completed by the end of the year, while POWER2 is scheduled to start in the third quarter and finish enrollment in the latter half of next year.
The company is also planning to initiate a monotherapy trial in the first half of 2026, based on the finding that vormatrigine's efficacy was not impacted by the reduction of other medications during the RADIANT trial. This development supports Praxis' argument that vormatrigine could potentially become a standalone therapy.
Financial Position and Industry Landscape
Praxis appears well-positioned to continue its clinical development program, reporting $447 million in cash and investments as of its second-quarter earnings report. This financial cushion is expected to sustain the company's operations into 2028, despite widening losses of $71.1 million in Q2 compared to $37.2 million in the same period last year.
The epilepsy treatment landscape remains competitive, with other companies like Neurona Therapeutics also making strides. Neurona's investigational cell therapy NRTX-1001 demonstrated a 92% median reduction in disabling seizures over 7-12 months in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy, with plans to move into Phase III trials later this year.
As Praxis continues to advance vormatrigine through clinical development, the pharmaceutical industry will be closely watching to see if this promising drug candidate can maintain its impressive efficacy and safety profile in larger, more comprehensive studies.
References
- Praxis’ Seizure Drug Demonstrates ‘Impressive’ Efficacy in Mid-Stage Trial
Praxis’ vormatrigine reduced seizures by 56.3%, an effect size that, according to analysts at Truist Securities, exceeds that of its closest competitors.
- Praxis links epilepsy drug to fall in seizures but sees 23% dropout rate
Praxis Precision Medicines has reported a 56.3% median reduction in seizure frequency from baseline in a midphase trial, encouraging the biotech to push ahead with phase 2/3 plans despite almost a quarter of patients discontinuing the epilepsy trial.
Explore Further
What differentiates vormatrigine from SK Life Science's Xcopri and Xenon Pharmaceuticals' XEN-1101 in terms of mechanism and efficacy?
What are the expected timelines for the completion of the POWER1 and POWER2 studies for vormatrigine?
How is Praxis planning to address the 23% patient discontinuation rate observed in the RADIANT trial for vormatrigine?
What has been the market response or feedback from analysts regarding the potential of vormatrigine as a standalone therapy?
How does Neurona Therapeutics' NRTX-1001 compare to vormatrigine in terms of efficacy and potential market impact in the epilepsy treatment landscape?