FDA Rejects Roche's Columvi for Earlier DLBCL Treatment, Citing Insufficient U.S. Data

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has declined to approve Roche's Columvi for earlier treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), dealing a setback to the pharmaceutical giant's expansion plans for the bispecific antibody. The decision highlights growing concerns at the FDA regarding the representation of U.S. patients in global clinical trials.
Columvi's Rejection and the FDA's Concerns
In a complete response letter, the FDA cited insufficient evidence to support the use of Columvi in second-line DLBCL treatment for the U.S. patient population. The rejection was based on data from the Phase III STARGLO study, which combined Columvi with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL.
Despite showing a 41% reduction in the risk of death compared to a rituximab-based regimen, the trial's results failed to convince the FDA's Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC). The committee voted 8-1 against Columvi's expansion, primarily due to concerns about the applicability of the efficacy data to U.S. patients. Of the more than 270 participants in STARGLO's intention-to-treat population, only 25 were from North America.
Implications for Global Clinical Trials
The FDA's decision reflects a growing emphasis on ensuring adequate representation of U.S. patients in oncology trials. Dr. Richard Pazdur, the FDA's oncology leader, noted that only about 20% of patients in oncology trials submitted to the agency are from the United States, a figure the FDA would like to see increased.
This issue extends beyond Roche's Columvi. In a separate advisory committee meeting for GSK's antibody-drug conjugate Blenrep, similar concerns were raised about the lack of U.S. patient enrollment. Committee member Daniel Spratt of Western Reserve University pointed out that GSK's "clinical development program enrolled almost no patients in the United States," which he argued "precludes any assessment of the [drug's] benefit-risk profile in the U.S."
Roche's Response and Future Plans
Despite the setback, Columvi remains under accelerated approval for third-line or later DLBCL treatment in the U.S. Roche and its subsidiary Genentech are now in discussions with the FDA to potentially use the ongoing Phase III SKYGLO study as a new postmarketing requirement for Columvi. This study is testing Columvi in combination with Polivy, Rituxan, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone for the treatment of patients with large B cell lymphoma.
Levi Garraway, M.D., Ph.D., Roche's chief medical officer and head of global product development, expressed disappointment but remained confident in Columvi's value for U.S. patients who have relapsed following initial treatment. He emphasized the company's commitment to exploring Columvi's potential in additional treatment settings, including as frontline therapy.
References
- Lack of US Data Stymie Roche’s Earlier-Stage Lymphoma Push for Columvi
Roche and Genentech were unable to sufficiently demonstrate the benefit of using Columvi in an earlier treatment setting for DLBCL in a U.S. population, according to the FDA.
- FDA rejects Roche's Columvi in earlier diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, citing lackluster US data
The other shoe has dropped for Roche’s bid to move Columvi into earlier treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the U.S. In a complete response letter, the FDA suggested that Roche's phase 3 Starglo data do not provide enough evidence to support the proposed indication in a U.S. population, according to the company.
Explore Further
What are the specific endpoints that the Phase III SKYGLO study aims to achieve for Columvi in treating large B cell lymphoma?
What are the key differences in patient demographic between the STARGLO study and typical U.S. DLBCL patients that concern the FDA?
How does the efficacy and safety of Columvi compare with rituximab-based regimens in studies prior to STARGLO?
What is Roche's plan for increasing U.S. patient representation in future DLBCL trials following the FDA's feedback?
What are the potential implications of the FDA's emphasis on U.S. patient representation for the global clinical trial strategies of pharma companies?