Bristol Myers Squibb's Reblozyl Fails Phase III Trial in Myelofibrosis-Associated Anemia, Company Remains Optimistic

Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) announced that its anemia drug Reblozyl (luspatercept) failed to meet the primary endpoint in a Phase III clinical trial for patients with myelofibrosis-associated anemia. Despite this setback, the pharmaceutical giant remains encouraged by the drug's clinical activity and plans to engage with regulatory authorities regarding potential submissions for this indication.
Trial Results and Clinical Implications
The INDEPENDENCE study, a late-stage trial evaluating Reblozyl in patients with myelofibrosis-associated anemia who required red blood cell transfusions, did not achieve statistical significance for its primary endpoint. The trial aimed to demonstrate independence from red blood cell transfusions for 12 consecutive weeks starting in the first 24 weeks of treatment.
BMS reported that while the primary endpoint was not met, with a P-value of 0.0674 narrowly missing the typical 0.05 threshold for statistical significance, patients treated with Reblozyl showed a "numerical and clinically meaningful improvement" in transfusion independence. The company also noted that several important secondary outcomes demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits favoring Reblozyl, including reduced transfusion burden and increased hemoglobin levels.
Anne Kerber, head of Hematology, Oncology, and Cell Therapy development at BMS, stated, "The totality of these results, including meaningful improvements in transfusion burden and hemoglobin levels, support the potential to address an unmet need in patients who have few treatment options."
Reblozyl's Market Performance and Future Prospects
Reblozyl, first approved by the FDA in 2019 for anemia in adult patients with beta thalassemia, has become one of BMS's top-selling assets. In 2024, the drug experienced a 76% year-on-year growth, generating $1.77 billion in sales. The strong market performance continued into 2025, with first-quarter sales reaching $478 million, a 35% increase from the same period last year.
Despite the recent trial setback, BMS remains committed to Reblozyl's potential in addressing myelofibrosis-associated anemia. The company plans to approach the FDA and European Medicines Agency to discuss submitting marketing applications for this indication. Additionally, BMS is conducting ongoing trials for Reblozyl in other areas, including a Phase III study (Element-MDS) in nontransfusion-dependent myelodysplastic syndromes anemia, expected to read out in 2027, and evaluations in alpha thalassemia.
Broader Context: BMS's Clinical Trial Challenges
The Reblozyl trial failure adds to a concerning trend of clinical setbacks for BMS in 2025. All four pivotal life-cycle management trials that have reported results this year for the company's existing drugs have yielded negative outcomes. These include trials for Opdualag in melanoma, Camzyos in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and Cobenfy in schizophrenia.
These clinical trial disappointments pose challenges for BMS as it navigates a significant patent cliff. The company had previously highlighted Reblozyl, along with four other products, as key components of its growth portfolio, expected to exceed 50% of BMS's revenues in 2025.
As the pharmaceutical landscape continues to evolve, BMS faces the task of bolstering its pipeline and maximizing the potential of its existing assets. The company's ability to navigate these challenges and capitalize on opportunities in areas of unmet medical need will be crucial for its future success in the competitive pharmaceutical market.
References
- BMS’ Anemia Drug Reblozyl Flunks Phase III Myelofibrosis Trial
Despite the failure, BMS remains “encouraged” by Reblozyl’s clinical activity in myelofibrosis-associated anemia and will approach regulators to discuss potential submissions for this indication, for which few treatment options exist.
- Bristol Myers braves failed Reblozyl ph. 3, plans FDA talks for potential anemia expansion
With the Reblozyl flop, all four of the pivotal trials that have read out this year for BMS’ currently marketed drugs have turned up negative.
Explore Further
What are the specific secondary outcomes in the Reblozyl trial that demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits?
How does Reblozyl's sales performance compare to its main competitors in the treatment of anemia?
What challenges does Bristol Myers Squibb face with its current drug pipeline considering the recent clinical trial setbacks?
What are the potential market opportunities for Reblozyl in the treatment of nontransfusion-dependent myelodysplastic syndromes anemia?
How might Bristol Myers Squibb's patent cliff impact its overall growth strategy and portfolio management?