Pharmaceutical Industry Faces Widespread Layoffs Amid Strategic Shifts and Financial Pressures

The pharmaceutical and biotech sectors continue to grapple with significant workforce reductions as companies reevaluate their strategic priorities and financial positions. Recent months have seen a wave of layoffs affecting thousands of employees across numerous organizations, ranging from industry giants to smaller biotech firms.
Major Players Implement Large-Scale Cuts
Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) stands out as one of the most prominent companies undergoing extensive restructuring. The pharmaceutical giant has announced plans to eliminate approximately 2,200 jobs by the end of 2024, with the goal of generating $1.5 billion in cost savings through 2025. This initiative has already resulted in over 1,300 layoffs this year, primarily affecting its New Jersey operations.
Similarly, Pfizer has unveiled a $3.5 billion cost-cutting program, which includes significant workforce reductions. The company recently disclosed plans to lay off 210 manufacturing employees across its Irish facilities and has already cut 210 jobs at its North Carolina sites.
Novartis, continuing its multi-year restructuring efforts, has announced the elimination of 427 positions at its U.S. headquarters in East Hanover, New Jersey. This follows previous cuts of 330 employees associated with site closures in Germany and Boston.
Biotech Firms Face Challenging Environment
Smaller biotech companies have not been spared from the industry-wide trend of workforce reductions. Notable examples include:
- Illumina's Grail division laying off 350 employees, representing about 25% of its workforce
- bluebird bio cutting 25% of its staff as part of a restructuring aimed at reducing cash operating expenses by 20%
- Caribou Biosciences parting ways with 21 people, or 12% of its workforce, as it discontinues preclinical development of allogeneic CAR-NK therapies
These layoffs often coincide with strategic shifts or pipeline reprioritizations. For instance, Vir Biotechnology announced a 25% reduction in its workforce (approximately 140 roles) as it abandons work on COVID-19 and influenza to focus on hepatitis B and D programs and expand into oncology.
Financial Pressures and Clinical Setbacks Drive Cuts
Many of the workforce reductions stem from financial pressures or disappointing clinical trial results. FibroGen, for example, is eliminating 75% of its U.S.-based workforce after two late-stage trials failed to meet primary endpoints. Similarly, Athira Pharma is laying off about 70% of its workforce following unsuccessful Phase II/III results for its Alzheimer's disease candidate.
The challenging funding environment for early-stage companies has also contributed to layoffs. Prime Medicine confirmed it had let go of "a small number of people" who primarily worked on shelved programs, as the gene editing company reorganized its pipeline to extend its cash runway.
As the pharmaceutical and biotech industries continue to navigate these challenges, the landscape of employment in the sector remains in flux. Companies are increasingly focused on streamlining operations, prioritizing high-potential programs, and extending cash runways in an uncertain economic environment.
References
- Rapt Shrinks Again After Dumping Asthma, Atopic Dermatitis Drug
Follow along as BioSpace tracks job cuts and restructuring initiatives throughout 2025.
Explore Further
How have the strategic priorities of major companies like Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer evolved in recent years?
What trends or factors are contributing to the widespread layoffs in biotech firms like Illumina's Grail division and bluebird bio?
How have financial pressures specifically influenced the layoffs at companies such as FibroGen and Athira Pharma?
What impact have clinical setback and trial results had on personnel changes in the pharmaceutical sector?
How is the current funding environment affecting early-stage biotech companies, particularly in terms of workforce retention?