Pfizer's $6B Bet on PD-1/VEGF Bispecific Antibodies Signals Industry Shift

Pfizer has made a significant move in the oncology space, announcing a $6 billion licensing deal with Chinese biotech 3SBio for its PD-1/VEGF bispecific antibody, SSGJ-707. This agreement marks Pfizer's latest foray into the increasingly competitive field of dual-targeting cancer immunotherapies, following closely on the heels of similar deals by other pharmaceutical giants.
Deal Structure and Financial Implications
The licensing pact, revealed on Monday evening, involves an upfront payment of $1.25 billion from Pfizer to 3SBio. The deal structure also includes up to $4.8 billion in potential development, regulatory, and commercial milestones, as well as tiered double-digit royalties on future sales. Additionally, Pfizer will make a $100 million equity investment in 3SBio upon the deal's closing.
This substantial investment surpasses recent PD-1/VEGF deals from other companies, with BMO Capital Markets noting that the "deal seems to be priced at a premium to others" in this space. For comparison, BioNTech acquired Biotheus and its PD-1/VEGF antibody in November for up to $950 million, while Merck paid $588 million upfront to LaNova Medicines for a similar asset.
Strategic Implications and Market Position
Pfizer's move comes as part of a broader industry trend, with PD-1/VEGF bispecific antibodies emerging as a highly sought-after class of cancer therapies. The deal gives Pfizer rights to SSGJ-707 outside of China, positioning the company to compete in this rapidly evolving market segment.
However, the timing of this agreement has raised questions among industry analysts. BMO Capital Markets expressed confusion regarding Pfizer's overall strategy, particularly in light of the company's February clinical trials collaboration with Summit Therapeutics for ivonescimab, another PD-1/VEGF bispecific antibody. The analysts noted, "We are left wondering how these two separate collaborations are reconciled and whether one of the PD-1/VEGF bispecifics being pursued is differentiated vs. the other."
Clinical Development and Potential Applications
SSGJ-707 is currently being evaluated for various solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic colorectal cancer, and gynecological tumors. Late-stage development of the asset is set to commence in China this year, with Pfizer likely to expand clinical trials to international markets.
The interest in PD-1/VEGF bispecific antibodies has been fueled by recent clinical successes, most notably the performance of ivonescimab in a late-stage NSCLC study where it outperformed Merck's blockbuster PD-1 inhibitor, Keytruda. This has led to a surge in development activity, with more than a dozen companies now pursuing similar therapies.
As the pharmaceutical landscape continues to evolve, Pfizer's substantial investment in SSGJ-707 underscores the potential of PD-1/VEGF bispecific antibodies to reshape cancer treatment paradigms. The coming months and years will reveal whether this bold move will pay off in the form of groundbreaking new therapies for cancer patients worldwide.
References
- Pfizer Puts $6B on the Line for 3SBio's PD-1/VEGF Antibody
The deal comes three months after Pfizer inked a PD-1/VEGF partnership with Summit Therapeutics, leading BMO Capital Markets to express confusion regarding the pharma's overall strategy.
- Pfizer buys into PD-1/VEGF competition with 3SBio deal
Pfizer will pay China’s 3SBio $1.25 billion up front to access a cancer drug that could rival Akeso and Summit’s closely watched immunotherapy ivonescimab.
Explore Further
What are the key terms and conditions of Pfizer's licensing deal with 3SBio for SSGJ-707?
What is known about the efficacy and safety data for SSGJ-707 in comparison to existing PD-1/VEGF bispecific antibodies?
How does Pfizer's investment in SSGJ-707 compare to similar transactions by other companies in the PD-1/VEGF space?
What are the profiles and strategic interests of Pfizer and 3SBio in the development of cancer immunotherapies?
Are other pharmaceutical companies pursuing similar bispecific antibody deals, and what might this indicate about industry trends?