Bayer's Restructuring Efforts and Industry Implications

Bayer AG, the German pharmaceutical and life sciences company, has made significant strides in its ongoing restructuring initiative, with far-reaching implications for the industry. The company's latest moves, coupled with recent developments in drug pricing policies, paint a complex picture of the evolving pharmaceutical landscape.
Massive Layoffs and Management Restructuring
Bayer CEO Bill Anderson revealed that the company has laid off approximately 2,000 employees in the first quarter of 2025, as part of a sweeping reorganization effort that began in July 2023. This brings the total number of job cuts to around 11,000 since the initiative's inception. The restructuring, which affects all three of Bayer's divisions—Pharmaceuticals, Crop Science, and Consumer Health—has primarily targeted management positions.
Chief Financial Officer Wolfgang Nickl emphasized the company's focus on reducing management layers, stating, "There is a very keen focus more on the level of positions that are reduced, they're mostly management positions." This approach aligns with Bayer's new Dynamic Shared Ownership (DSO) operating model, unveiled in January 2024, which aims to make the company "much more agile."
The transition to the DSO model has involved significant changes at the executive level as well. In March 2024, Bayer reduced its executive roster from 14 to eight, effectively removing nearly half of its top leadership. Anderson asserts that these changes have made Bayer "leaner, faster and more productive," while allowing the company to reallocate resources to "highest-impact work."
Financial Performance and Product Highlights
Despite the extensive restructuring, Bayer's financial performance in the first quarter of 2025 remained relatively stable. The company reported sales of €13.738 billion (approximately $15.3 billion) across all divisions, representing a marginal 0.1% decline compared to the same period last year.
The pharmaceutical division emerged as Bayer's strongest unit, growing 4.1% year-on-year to earn €4.548 billion (roughly $5 billion) in Q1. Notably, two products showed exceptional growth:
- Kerendia, a chronic kidney disease therapy, surged 87% year-on-year
- Nubeqa, a prostate cancer drug, jumped 78%
However, not all products performed well. The company's anticoagulant Xarelto experienced a significant 31% decline in the quarter, primarily due to generic competition in Japan and Europe.
Drug Pricing Policies and Global Innovation
The pharmaceutical industry is closely watching the implications of President Donald Trump's recent Most Favored Nations executive order, which aims to peg U.S. drug prices to the lowest prices in comparable nations. While acknowledging that it's "too soon to say" what the exact impact will be, Bayer CEO Bill Anderson sees this development as an opportunity for European countries to reassess their role in funding pharmaceutical innovation.
Anderson emphasized the need for a balanced approach to drug pricing that ensures patient access while sustaining innovation. He stated, "What's important is that policymakers from all the major countries having dialogue about how to make sure that we continue to fund advances in cancer, in chronic diseases, so that we don't lose the benefits for the next generation."
The CEO highlighted the United States' leadership in biotech innovation and its "unique combination" of pricing that has historically provided both patient access and incentives for continued research and development. Anderson called on European countries to ensure they are funding their "fair share" of biopharma innovation, echoing language used by President Trump in signing the executive order.
References
- Bayer’s Continued Restructuring Claims 2,000 Jobs and Thins Management Layers
Meanwhile, Bayer CEO Bill Anderson said Donald Trump’s Most Favored Nations policy could present an opportunity for European countries to make sure they are also funding their “fair share” of biopharma innovation.
Explore Further
What impact have the layoffs and management restructuring had on Bayer's operational efficiency?
How have Bayer's restructuring efforts affected employee morale and company culture?
What experience and qualifications do the newly appointed executives bring to Bayer’s leadership team?
Are there other companies in the pharmaceutical industry undergoing similar personnel changes and restructuring?
What strategic reasons might Bayer have for implementing these specific personnel changes?