FDA Scrambles to Rehire Key Personnel Amid User Fee Program Crisis

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is taking urgent steps to address a staffing crisis that threatens to derail its critical user fee programs. According to recent reports, the agency is actively seeking to rehire key negotiators and support staff who were recently laid off, in a bid to salvage its ability to collect user fees from pharmaceutical companies.
Mass Layoffs Jeopardize FDA's Funding and Operations
Since Robert F. Kennedy Jr. assumed his role as Secretary of Health and Human Services in February, the FDA has experienced unprecedented staffing cuts. Approximately 3,500 employees have been laid off, including personnel crucial to the negotiation and renewal of user fee programs. These programs, which allow the FDA to collect fees from companies whose products it reviews, account for nearly half of the agency's total budget.
The exodus of employees has not been limited to lower-level staff. High-ranking officials, such as Peter Marks, former director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, and Peter Stein, ex-director of the Office of New Drugs, have also departed the agency, either through forced early retirement or termination.
Rehiring Efforts and the Race Against Time
In response to this crisis, the FDA is now attempting to rehire at least one user fee negotiator and nine other employees who supported user fee processes. According to anonymous sources cited by Reuters, the negotiator has expressed intention to return, while the plans of the support staff remain unclear.
The urgency of these rehiring efforts is underscored by the impending timeline for user fee program renewal. Negotiations for the next five-year cycle, set to begin in 2027, are scheduled to start this September. The complexity of these negotiations requires a significant lead time, making the current staffing situation particularly precarious.
Potential Consequences of Failure
Policy expert Alexander Gaffney has warned of a potential "catastrophic collapse" if the FDA fails to address its staffing issues. If employee numbers drop below a certain threshold, it could trigger a mechanism preventing the FDA from collecting user fees altogether. While there is some breathing room—the actual trigger occurs at the end of the fiscal year—failure to avert this crisis could set U.S. pharmaceutical regulation back by more than three decades.
The loss of user fee funding would not only impact the FDA's budget but could also significantly slow down drug approvals and other regulatory processes, potentially affecting the entire pharmaceutical industry and, by extension, patient access to new treatments.
As the FDA races to rebuild its workforce and salvage its user fee programs, the pharmaceutical industry watches closely, aware that the outcome of this crisis could have far-reaching implications for drug development and regulation in the United States.
References
- FDA Rehires User Fee Negotiators After Mass Employee Layoffs: Reuters
The FDA’s user free programs account for just under half of the agency’s budget—money that could be imperiled by the recent staffing exodus.
Explore Further
What specific roles did the previously laid-off personnel fulfill within the FDA's user fee programs?
What are the potential financial implications for the FDA if it fails to rehire the necessary staff for user fee negotiations?
How have other regulatory agencies globally responded to similar staffing crises?
What measures might the FDA implement to attract and retain critical staff amidst these layoffs?
Are there precedents for such large-scale layoffs at the FDA or similar agencies, and what outcomes resulted from those?