Major Players Implement Cost-Cutting Measures

Several large pharmaceutical companies have announced substantial workforce reductions as part of broader cost-saving initiatives. Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) continues its strategic reorganization, with plans to save an additional $2 billion through 2027 on top of an ongoing program targeting $1.5 billion in cost cuts by the end of 2025. The company has laid off or announced plans to lay off nearly 1,330 employees this year, including recent cuts of 117 staff in Lawrenceville, New Jersey.
Similarly, Pfizer is implementing layoffs as part of its $3.5 billion cost-cutting initiative announced last October. The company recently disclosed plans to eliminate up to 210 manufacturing jobs across sites in Ireland and has let go of 150 employees from its Sanford, North Carolina facility and 60 from its Rocky Mount, North Carolina site.
Novartis has also continued its restructuring efforts, laying off 29 employees in San Diego and planning to eliminate approximately 100 more jobs as it winds down its development site there. This follows the company's earlier announcement of plans to cut hundreds of development jobs worldwide.
Biotech Firms Face Pipeline Challenges and Strategic Shifts
Smaller biotech companies have not been immune to the industry-wide trend of workforce reductions. Many of these cuts have been triggered by clinical trial failures or strategic refocusing efforts.
FibroGen announced it will eliminate 75% of its U.S.-based workforce after two late-stage trials failed to meet the primary endpoint of overall survival. The company is implementing an "immediate and significant" cost reduction plan to terminate its pamrevlumab program and halt any obligations to the drug.
Vir Biotechnology revealed plans to lay off 25% of its workforce, eliminating approximately 140 roles across its operations. This reduction is part of a major shift in its research and development priorities, abandoning work on COVID-19 and influenza to focus on hepatitis B and D programs and moving into the cancer space via a deal with Sanofi.
Meanwhile, bluebird bio announced it will cut about 25% of its workforce as part of a restructuring aimed at reducing cash operating expenses by 20%. The company plans to focus resources on advancing clinical development of its gene therapies for several diseases.
Impact on Research and Development
The widespread layoffs and restructuring efforts have raised concerns about the potential impact on research and development within the pharmaceutical industry. As companies streamline operations and reprioritize their pipelines, some research programs are being discontinued or scaled back.
For instance, Genentech recently closed its cancer immunology group as part of a reprioritization of investments in cancer research. The company also laid off 93 employees at its South San Francisco headquarters, with scientist roles being the hardest hit.
Similarly, Prime Medicine confirmed it had laid off "a small number of people" following a pipeline reorganization meant to extend its cash runway. The gene editing company is focusing its efforts on advancing its most promising programs while shelving others.
These developments highlight the delicate balance companies must strike between managing costs and maintaining innovation in an increasingly competitive and challenging market environment.
References
- TC BioPharm, Cargo Enact Steep Workforce Reductions
2024 was a tough year for the biopharma industry, with several companies cutting hundreds or even thousands of employees. Follow along as BioSpace tracks job cuts and restructuring initiatives throughout 2025.
Explore Further
How have the recent workforce reductions impacted the overall performance and strategic goals of Bristol Myers Squibb?
What are the long-term implications of Pfizer's $3.5 billion cost-cutting initiative on its manufacturing and research capabilities?
How are Novartis' global restructuring efforts influencing its research and development priorities?
What factors have led FibroGen to terminate its pamrevlumab program, and how will it impact the company's future research focus?
How might Genentech's closure of its cancer immunology group affect its position in the cancer research market?