Private Equity Firms' Increasing Acquisitions of Disability Care Providers Raise Quality Concerns

Private equity firms are rapidly expanding their presence in the disability care sector, with over 1,000 acquisitions of disability and elder care providers between 2013 and 2023, according to a new report from the Private Equity Stakeholder Project. This trend has sparked concerns about potential impacts on care quality and patient safety.
Rapid Expansion and Industry Attraction
The disability care industry, traditionally dominated by nonprofit and faith-based organizations, has become an attractive target for private equity investments. Firms are drawn to the sector due to growing demand for care, high levels of fragmentation, and its perceived recession-resistant nature.
However, the report suggests that the private equity model's focus on short-term financial gains could compromise care quality. Eileen O'Grady, director of programs at PESP and lead author of the report, stated, "Private equity firms are fundamentally altering these services in ways that put some of the most vulnerable members of our communities at risk."
Quality Concerns and Regulatory Challenges
Investigations in multiple states, including Florida, Indiana, California, and Illinois, have uncovered problems stemming from cost-cutting measures implemented by private equity-owned facilities. These issues include severe understaffing and improper use of restraints, potentially jeopardizing patient care.
The report highlights regulatory loopholes that allow for varying safety standards, making it difficult to ensure consistent quality across privately-owned care centers. This is particularly concerning given that patients in disability care centers often have multiple comorbidities and may be unable to advocate for themselves.
Financial Practices and Patient Impact
While some facilities faced accusations of neglecting patients, they simultaneously engaged in practices that benefited investors. For instance, Centerbridge Partners and Vistria Group reportedly paid themselves more than $600 million in dividends from Sevita and Help at Home, even as care standards allegedly declined.
In more severe cases, cost-cutting measures have been linked to direct harm to patients. In Indiana, a patient at a Help at Home facility reportedly died of neglect after weighing just 71 pounds. In Illinois, regulators shut down Broadstep Behavioral Health group homes due to "significant deficiencies" in medication management, staff training, and safety measures.
As private equity firms continue to reshape the disability care landscape, industry watchdogs and healthcare advocates are calling for increased scrutiny and regulation to ensure that financial interests do not compromise the quality of care for some of society's most vulnerable individuals.
References
- Private equity firms are increasingly buying up disability care centers
Over 10 years, private equity firms acquired more than 1,000 disability care providers, but intense pressures to turn a profit could harm quality, according to the Private Equity Stakeholder Project.
Explore Further
What are the specific regulatory loopholes that allow varying safety standards in privately-owned disability care centers?
How does the demand for recession-resistant investments influence private equity firms' decisions in the disability care sector?
What measures are being proposed by industry watchdogs to increase scrutiny and regulation of private equity-owned disability care providers?
Which states have been most affected by the quality concerns related to cost-cutting measures in private equity-owned facilities?
How do the financial practices of firms like Centerbridge Partners and Vistria Group impact their ability to maintain care standards at their acquired facilities?