Novo Nordisk's CagriSema Falls Short of Weight Loss Expectations in Latest Trial

Novo Nordisk's ambitious pursuit of groundbreaking weight loss treatments has hit another stumbling block, as its next-generation drug CagriSema failed to meet lofty expectations in its latest clinical trial. The Danish pharmaceutical giant reported disappointing results from its Phase III REDEFINE 2 study, adding to investor concerns following similarly underwhelming data from the REDEFINE 1 trial released in December 2024.
REDEFINE 2 Results: A Closer Look
The REDEFINE 2 trial, which tested CagriSema in 1,200 overweight or obese patients with type 2 diabetes, showed a 15.7% reduction in body weight after 68 weeks of treatment. While this outcome met the study's primary endpoint of achieving statistically significant and superior weight loss compared to placebo, it fell short of the company's earlier projections and market expectations.
Key findings from the REDEFINE 2 trial include:
- 15.7% weight loss in patients with diabetes after 68 weeks
- 13.7% weight loss in an analysis disregarding treatment adherence
- 89.7% of participants lost at least 5% of their body weight
- Placebo group experienced a 3.1% drop in body weight
Martin Holst Lange, Novo Nordisk's executive vice president of development, maintained a positive outlook, stating that the findings "confirmed the superior efficacy of CagriSema in people with overweight or obesity and type 2 diabetes."
Market Reaction and Competitive Landscape
The underwhelming results have sent shockwaves through the market, with Novo Nordisk's stock price plummeting nearly 7% following the announcement. This decline follows a similar investor reaction in December 2024, when the REDEFINE 1 trial results wiped approximately $72 billion off the company's market capitalization.
Analysts at Leerink Partners noted that expectations for CagriSema at 68 weeks "were higher," especially given Novo's earlier announcement of a 15.6% reduction in weight at just 32 weeks in the same trial. The latest data also puts CagriSema in a potentially less favorable position compared to Eli Lilly's Zepbound (tirzepatide), which demonstrated comparable weight loss results in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Future Outlook and Regulatory Plans
Despite the setbacks, Novo Nordisk remains committed to the development of CagriSema. The company plans to engage with health authorities worldwide and aims to file its regulatory submission in the first quarter of 2026.
Novo Nordisk is also exploring ways to optimize CagriSema's efficacy. During a recent earnings call, Martin Holst Lange suggested that a more personalized treatment approach, taking into account factors such as initial dose escalation and trial duration, could potentially enhance the drug's effectiveness while maintaining a favorable safety profile.
As the pharmaceutical industry continues to focus on innovative obesity treatments, the coming months will be crucial for Novo Nordisk as it seeks to position CagriSema in an increasingly competitive market.
References
- Novo Dips After CagriSema’s Latest Lower-Than-Expected Weight Loss Readout
The latest data showed 15.7% weight loss in patients with diabetes after 68 weeks. In December 2024, CagriSema returned another disappointing readout for Novo, eliciting weight-loss of 22.7% in patients without diabetes, below the pharma’s prior projection of 25%.
- Novo Nordisk links CagriSema to 16% weight loss, sending stock down again
Novo Nordisk’s vision of 25%-plus weight loss is looking further and further away. Three months after missing that target in its first phase 3 CagriSema trial, the Danish drugmaker has fallen even further short of that bar in the second study.
Explore Further
What specific strategies is Novo Nordisk considering to optimize the efficacy of CagriSema beyond adjusting initial dose escalation and trial duration?
How do the clinical trial results of Eli Lilly's Zepbound compare to those of Novo Nordisk's CagriSema in terms of weight loss and overall efficacy?
What are the potential market implications for Novo Nordisk if CagriSema cannot demonstrate a significant advantage over existing treatments like tirzepatide?
What has been the historical market impact on Novo Nordisk's stock in response to previous trial setbacks, and how does it compare to the recent 7% decline?
What are the global regulatory challenges Novo Nordisk might face in filing for CagriSema's approval, and how does the company plan to address them?