Astellas' Izervay Secures FDA Label Update, Intensifying Competition with Apellis in GA Market

NoahAI News ·
Astellas' Izervay Secures FDA Label Update, Intensifying Competition with Apellis in GA Market

Astellas Pharma's geographic atrophy (GA) treatment Izervay has received a crucial label update from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), removing the previous 12-month limitation on its use. This development marks a significant shift in the competitive landscape for GA treatments, particularly in relation to Apellis Pharmaceuticals' rival drug, Syfovre.

FDA Lifts Treatment Duration Restriction

The FDA's decision to update Izervay's label allows for treatment beyond the initial 12-month window, providing physicians and patients with greater flexibility in managing GA secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Marci English, Astellas' senior vice president of biopharma and ophthalmology development, expressed satisfaction with the decision, stating that it reinforces "Izervay's status as a trusted choice for thousands of GA patients since its launch in 2023."

This label update comes as a reversal of the FDA's initial rejection in November, which had resulted in a temporary slowdown of Izervay's launch. Astellas executives had previously reported that many retina specialists were pausing Izervay use for patients who reached the 12-month mark due to the label restriction.

Market Implications and Competitive Landscape

The removal of the treatment duration limitation for Izervay intensifies its competition with Apellis' Syfovre in the GA market. While Syfovre still maintains an advantage with its approved monthly or every-other-month dosing options, Izervay's label update is expected to help it regain momentum in the market.

Analyst Lachlan Hanbury-Brown from William Blair noted that this development represents a "reversal of a small bump" that Syfovre had experienced following Izervay's initial label limitations. However, he maintains that Syfovre has blockbuster potential in GA, citing its "superior efficacy relative to competitor Izervay" as a key factor that will "ultimately drive significant market share as physicians move beyond a focus on safety."

The efficacy comparison between the two drugs remains a point of contention. Hanbury-Brown highlighted data from the drugs' FDA labels, noting that monthly Izervay yields a 14% reduction in observed lesion growth after 24 months, compared to 18.1% and 21.9% decreases for monthly and every-other-month Syfovre, respectively. However, Astellas executives have challenged such cross-trial comparisons, arguing that definitive claims about relative efficacy cannot be made without head-to-head studies.

As the GA treatment landscape continues to evolve, both Astellas and Apellis are positioning their products to capture market share in this growing therapeutic area. The coming months will likely reveal how this latest development impacts prescribing patterns and patient outcomes in the management of geographic atrophy.

References