Astellas Faces Regulatory Challenges and Impairment Charges for Eye Drug Izervay

Astellas Pharma, the Japanese pharmaceutical giant, is navigating a complex landscape of regulatory hurdles and market competition for its geographic atrophy (GA) treatment, Izervay. Recent developments have led to significant financial implications and a reassessment of the drug's global strategy.
Regulatory Setbacks and Market Performance
Izervay's launch trajectory has been impacted by regulatory challenges in both the United States and Europe. In the U.S., the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unexpectedly rejected a label update for Izervay in GA secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This decision has led to a slowdown in the drug's market performance, with sales reaching $107 million in the last quarter of 2024, representing only a 4% quarter-over-quarter increase.
Astellas Chief Financial Officer Atsushi Kitamura attributed this deceleration to the FDA's decision and changes in inventory levels. The company is now awaiting a new FDA decision date of February 26 for the label update, which aims to include positive two-year trial results for monthly and every-other-month dosing in patients with GA secondary to AMD.
In Europe, Astellas withdrew its marketing authorization application for Izervay in October following discussions with the European Medicines Agency. This withdrawal prompted a substantial impairment charge of 115.1 billion Japanese yen ($760 million) in the last quarter.
Competitive Landscape and Market Strategy
Despite these challenges, Astellas maintains a positive outlook on Izervay's market position. The company reports that Izervay leads in new patient starts, claiming 60% of the new patient market share from October to November and 40% of the total market share. Astellas executives, including Chief Commercial Officer Claus Zieler, emphasize Izervay's established safety profile as a key advantage over competitors.
The primary rival in the GA market is Apellis Pharmaceuticals' Syfovre, which launched six months before Izervay in 2023. While some analysts, such as William Blair's Lachlan Hanbury-Brown, suggest that Syfovre may have superior efficacy and blockbuster potential, Astellas disputes these claims, arguing that such comparisons cannot be made without head-to-head studies.
Financial Impact and Future Outlook
The regulatory challenges and market competition have had a significant financial impact on Astellas. In addition to the Izervay-related impairment, the company recorded a 51.8 billion Japanese yen ($339 million) impairment loss on its myotonic dystrophy gene therapy prospect AT466. Total impairments for the quarter amounted to 180 billion Japanese yen ($1.18 billion).
Despite these setbacks, Astellas reported strong overall financial performance, with total revenue reaching 1.45 trillion Japanese yen ($9.52 billion) over the last nine months of 2024, a 22% increase from the previous year. This growth was largely driven by the prostate cancer drug Xtandi and the bladder cancer treatment Padcev.
Looking ahead, Astellas remains committed to expanding Izervay's global reach. The company has submitted a new application in Japan and is engaging in discussions with regulatory authorities in major markets. Astellas is also considering a resubmission in Europe after concluding talks with officials there, underscoring its determination to overcome current challenges and establish Izervay as a leading treatment for geographic atrophy worldwide.
References
- Astellas takes $760M charge, reveals slowdown for eye drug Izervay after regulatory stumbles
The company is in talks with individual regulatory authorities after its decision to withdraw a European approval application for Izervay prompted a $760 million impairment charge.
Explore Further
What are the specific reasons behind the FDA's rejection of the label update for Izervay in GA secondary to AMD?
How does Izervay's market share of new patient starts compare to its overall market share in the GA treatment landscape?
What differentiates Izervay's safety profile from that of its main competitor, Syfovre, by Apellis Pharmaceuticals?
What prompted Astellas to withdraw its marketing authorization application for Izervay in Europe?
How does the current regulatory environment in Japan and other major markets affect Astellas's strategy for global expansion of Izervay?