Cargo Therapeutics Halts CAR-T Program Amid Safety Concerns and Efficacy Issues

Cargo Therapeutics, a biopharmaceutical company focused on developing CAR-T cell therapies, announced a significant setback in its lead program, resulting in a major restructuring of the company. The decision comes after an ad-hoc analysis of their phase 2 trial revealed disappointing efficacy and serious safety concerns.
Firi-cel Program Terminated Following Underwhelming Trial Results
Cargo's lead candidate, firicabtagene autoleucel (firi-cel), an autologous CD22 CAR-T cell therapy, was being evaluated in a phase 2 trial for patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) whose disease had relapsed or was unresponsive to CD19 CAR-T therapy. The trial, which had dosed 71 patients, was initially viewed as potentially pivotal for the company's future.
However, an interim analysis of data from 51 patients painted a grim picture:
- Overall response (OR) rate: 77%
- Complete response (CR) rate: 43%
- Three-month durability of CR: 18%
The durability of complete response, a critical clinical endpoint for LBCL patients who are refractory or relapsed to CD19 CAR-T cell therapy, fell far short of expectations.
Safety Concerns Amplify Decision to Discontinue Firi-cel
Compounding the efficacy issues, the trial revealed significant safety concerns:
- 18% of patients developed grade 3 or higher immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome (IEC-HS)
- Grade 4 and 5 serious adverse events were reported, with grade 5 indicating patient death
The high occurrence and severity of IEC-HS, a known toxicity associated with CAR-T cell therapy, further contributed to the company's decision to terminate the firi-cel program.
Gina Chapman, CEO of Cargo Therapeutics, expressed disappointment with the unexpected results, stating, "Combined with a higher-than-expected occurrence and severity of IEC-HS, the data generated so far does not meet our expectations of a competitive benefit-risk profile for patients in the context of available treatment options."
Corporate Restructuring and Financial Impact
In response to these developments, Cargo Therapeutics has announced a significant corporate restructuring:
- 50% reduction in workforce
- Shift in focus to CRG-023, a trispecific CAR-T therapy entering phase 1 dose-escalation trials
- Extension of cash runway into mid-2028, with $368.1 million on hand at the start of 2025
The news had an immediate and severe impact on Cargo's stock price, which plummeted 75% in premarket trading, falling from $13.19 to $3.31.
William Blair analysts expressed surprise at the trial's outcome, noting the contrast with promising phase 1 results. They speculated that the challenging patient population, who had previously undergone CAR-T treatment, might have contributed to the lack of durability due to higher proportions of terminal effector memory cells or immunosuppressive T regulatory cells in their CAR-T products.
As Cargo Therapeutics navigates this setback, the company will continue to evaluate its strategic options while advancing its remaining pipeline candidates. The discontinuation of the firi-cel program serves as a stark reminder of the challenges inherent in developing novel cell therapies, particularly for heavily pretreated patient populations.
References
- Cargo offloads CAR-T along with half of its workforce in wake of low efficacy, toxic side effects
Cargo Therapeutics is lightening its load, jettisoning 50% of its employees along with the CAR-T company’s lead candidate in the wake of weak durability and serious side effects.
Explore Further
What is the professional background of Gina Chapman, the CEO of Cargo Therapeutics, and how might it influence the company's strategic decisions following the program halt?
How has Cargo Therapeutics's financial performance and staffing situation evolved in recent years prior to the current restructuring?
What are some notable personnel changes that have recently occurred in other companies developing CAR-T therapies?
What could be the underlying factors contributing to the 50% workforce reduction at Cargo Therapeutics?
In light of the restructuring, what have been some recent executive changes at Cargo Therapeutics?