Allakos Halts AK006 Program, Initiates Major Restructuring After Phase 1 Failure

Allakos Inc., a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, has announced the discontinuation of its AK006 program and a significant restructuring following disappointing phase 1 trial results in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). The decision marks a critical setback for the company and raises questions about the viability of Siglec-6 as a therapeutic target.
Phase 1 Trial Results and Program Termination
The phase 1 trial, which evaluated AK006 in 34 adults with moderate-to-severe CSU, failed to demonstrate efficacy superior to placebo. Patients receiving AK006 showed an 8.2-point improvement on a 42-point disease scale, while the placebo group improved by 12.4 points. The proportion of complete responses was identical in both arms at 9%.
Dr. Chin Lee, Chief Medical Officer of Allakos, noted that the placebo response was "in line with what we've seen for other CSU clinical trials." However, the lack of differentiation from placebo led to the company's decision to halt further development of AK006.
Corporate Restructuring and Strategic Alternatives
In response to the clinical setback, Allakos has announced a sweeping restructuring plan:
- 75% of employees will be laid off
- Clinical, manufacturing, research, and administrative functions related to AK006 will be discontinued
- Approximately 15 employees will be retained to explore strategic alternatives and manage compliance and wind-down activities
CEO Robert Alexander, Ph.D., commented on the failure's implications: "We don't know why the preclinical data didn't translate in humans, but clearly it did not. All we can say now is that we know that [Siglec-]6 is not active in CSU, whether it would be active in another disease setting we don't know."
Financial Impact and Future Outlook
The restructuring will have a significant impact on Allakos' financial position:
- Estimated restructuring costs: $34 million to $38 million
- Cash reserves expected to decrease from $81 million to $35-40 million by mid-year
- The company will explore "the usual things" in terms of strategic alternatives
Alexander added, "We'll do that for a period of time and if something comes up we'll pursue it. If not, we'll continue with the wind-down of the company."
This development follows a series of setbacks for Allakos, including the failure of its previous lead candidate, lirentelimab, in two phase 2 trials last year. The company's future now hangs in the balance as it explores strategic options in a challenging biotech market.
References
- Allakos axes program, lays off 75% of staff and seeks strategic alternatives after phase 1 flop
Allakos is throwing in the towel. After seeing phase 1 data in hives, the biotech has decided to drop the drug candidate and lay off 75% of its employees to hunker down while exploring strategic alternatives.
Explore Further
What has been the financial performance of Allakos Inc. over the past few years, particularly after the failure of its previous lead candidate?
Can you provide a background on the recent executive and key personnel changes at Allakos Inc.?
Have there been similar layoffs or restructuring initiatives in other biotech companies within the same field recently?
What factors may have contributed to the significant layoff decision at Allakos Inc.?
What is the professional background and experience of CEO Robert Alexander, and how might his leadership influence Allakos' strategic decisions moving forward?