Biotech IPO Landscape Evolves: Quality Over Quantity in 2024

The biotechnology industry witnessed a notable shift in its initial public offering (IPO) landscape in 2024, marking a return to what experts are calling a "rational IPO environment." Despite initial perceptions of a slow year, 2024 actually represented a normalization of the market, with a focus on quality over quantity in public debuts.
IPO Market Trends and Statistics
In 2024, 18 biotechnology companies went public in the United States, a significant increase from the 10 IPOs seen in 2023. This uptick was triggered by a flurry of mergers and acquisitions in the latter half of 2023, according to Morgan Stanley Executive Director Chirag Surti. The majority of these newly public companies were clinical-stage entities targeting large, tangible markets.
Notably, only one traditional preclinical biotech, Metagenomi, made its public debut in 2024. This stands in stark contrast to 2020 and 2021, when approximately a quarter of biotech IPOs were preclinical companies. The focus has clearly shifted towards more mature companies with nearer-term catalysts.
Sector Focus and Company Profiles
About two-thirds of the companies that went public in 2024 were concentrated in three main therapeutic areas: central nervous system (CNS) disorders, immunology and inflammation (I&I), and oncology. This trend reflects investor preference for companies addressing significant unmet medical needs in these fields.
One standout example is Septerna, a company developing G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) therapies. Septerna raised an impressive $331 million in its October IPO, having previously secured a $150 million Series B round in July 2023. CEO Jeff Finer, M.D., Ph.D., emphasized the importance of long-term planning, noting that the company had mapped out its capital needs through 2028 before going public.
Another notable IPO was that of Rapport Therapeutics, which debuted on the Nasdaq in June with a $154 million offering. The CNS-focused biotech is utilizing these funds to advance its small molecule therapies towards proof-of-concept trials in focal epilepsy, peripheral neuropathic pain, and bipolar disorder.
Investor Perspectives and Market Dynamics
The current IPO environment is characterized by increased scrutiny from investors, particularly as generalist investors have largely exited the healthcare sector. Sofinnova Investments General Partner Maha Katabi, Ph.D., stressed the critical importance of asset derisking and building a compelling narrative for specialist investors.
"Building the story and building the narrative as to why they should own your stock versus the probably 200 other stocks they can pick from in the public market is the most important aspect," Katabi explained.
Troy Ignelzi, Chief Financial Officer of Rapport Therapeutics, echoed this sentiment, emphasizing the need for prudence in valuations and selectivity in public offerings. He argued that demonstrating the quality of public biotech companies is crucial for potentially attracting generalist investors back to the sector.
As the industry moves forward, the focus remains on companies with clear timelines to significant catalysts, typically within a year of their IPO. This trend, coupled with the emphasis on quality over quantity, suggests a more stable and sustainable approach to biotech public offerings in the current market environment.
References
- ‘A really rational IPO environment’: What does it takes for a biotech to go public now?
After what many considered a “slow” year for initial public offerings, January has ushered in a string of biotechs filing to go public. But 2024 wasn’t slow—it was actually quite normal.
Explore Further
What were the main factors that led to the increase in biotechnology IPOs from 2023 to 2024?
What are the strategic advantages for biotech companies like Septerna in securing large funding rounds before going public?
How have investor preferences shifted regarding therapeutic areas in biotech IPOs in 2024?
What specific challenges do biotech companies face when building a compelling narrative for investors according to Maha Katabi?
How might demonstrating quality over quantity in biotech IPOs potentially attract generalist investors back to the sector?