Guardant Wins $292 Million in False Advertising Case Against Natera Over Cancer Tests

Guardant Health secured a pivotal victory in its legal battle against Natera, with a federal jury awarding $292.5 million in a false advertising case[1][2]. The lawsuit, which began in May 2021, accused Natera of making misleading comparisons between its Signatera test and Guardant's Reveal liquid biopsy test, designed to detect colorectal cancer[1]. Guardant claimed Natera's advertising falsely emphasized differences in test sensitivities and predictive values to promote a preference for Signatera[2]. The court found these actions to be deceptive, awarding significant compensatory and punitive damages, marking this as one of the largest false advertising verdicts to date[1].
References
Explore Further
What specific misleading claims did Natera make about its Signatera test compared to Guardant's Reveal test?
How might the outcome of this case influence the marketing strategies of other cancer diagnostic companies?
What are the potential repercussions for Natera if the appeal of the verdict is unsuccessful?
In what ways does the case between Guardant and Natera highlight the importance of accurate advertising in healthcare?
How could this legal victory affect Guardant's position in the market for colorectal cancer diagnostics?