Moonlake's Sonelokimab Falls Short in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Trials, Casting Doubt on Approval Path

Moonlake Immunotherapeutics faced a significant setback as its experimental immune disease drug, sonelokimab, failed to meet investor expectations in two pivotal clinical trials for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). The disappointing results led to a dramatic 80% crash in the Swiss biotech's stock price, erasing more than four-fifths of the company's market value.
Mixed Results in Late-Stage Trials
The first of two late-stage trials showed that approximately 35% of participants treated with sonelokimab experienced a significant reduction in disease symptoms after four months, compared to 18% in the placebo group. While this result met statistical significance, the difference between the treatment and placebo groups fell short of expectations.
In the second study, sonelokimab failed to meet its primary objective. Moonlake attributed this failure to an unexpectedly high placebo response, which complicated the interpretation of the drug's efficacy.
Competitive Landscape and Market Implications
Sonelokimab, which targets two inflammatory cytokines and albumin, was positioned as a potential advancement over existing biologics such as AbbVie's Humira, UCB's Bimzelx, and Novartis' Cosentyx. The drug's unique binding mechanism and small molecular size were thought to offer improved potency and duration of effect.
However, the recent trial results have cast doubt on sonelokimab's competitive edge. Analysts from RBC Capital Markets described the observed effects as "uncompetitive" with Bimzelx, suggesting that sonelokimab may be relegated to a much narrower role in the treatment landscape for hidradenitis suppurativa.
Regulatory Uncertainty and Future Prospects
Moonlake plans to discuss the approval path with regulators while the trials continue. However, multiple Wall Street analysts have expressed skepticism about the likelihood of a quick approval and the drug's sales potential.
The company emphasized that pooled results from both studies demonstrated "clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement" across all trial goals. Nonetheless, the unexpected performance of the placebo group in the failed trial has introduced significant uncertainty regarding the drug's regulatory future and commercial outlook.
As Moonlake grapples with these challenges, the path forward for sonelokimab in hidradenitis suppurativa treatment remains unclear, with analysts suggesting that a "clear path to approval" is likely off the table in the near term.
References
- Moonlake shares crash on mixed study results for immune drug
Anticipated late-stage results in the skin disease hidradenitis suppurativa were described by analysts as “disappointing” and “undifferentiated,” erasing more than four-fifths of the company’s market value.
Explore Further
What are the key factors leading to the high placebo response in the second trial of sonelokimab for hidradenitis suppurativa?
What distinguishes sonelokimab’s mechanism of action from currently approved biologics like Humira, Bimzelx, and Cosentyx?
What is the estimated market size for treatments targeting hidradenitis suppurativa, and how might sonelokimab’s potential approval impact it?
What specific regulatory challenges could Moonlake face in pursuing approval for sonelokimab given the mixed trial results?
What are the latest efficacy and safety data of competitive biologics being used or developed for hidradenitis suppurativa?