Biopharma Layoffs Surge as Companies Prioritize Cost-Cutting and Key Programs

Pharmaceutical Industry Workforce Reshaping Amid Strategic Shifts and Market Pressures
The pharmaceutical and biotech sectors are experiencing significant workforce restructuring as companies navigate challenging market conditions, reprioritize pipelines, and realign resources. Recent months have seen a wave of layoffs affecting thousands of employees across numerous organizations, from industry giants to emerging biotechs.
Strategic Realignments and Cost-Cutting Measures
Several major pharmaceutical companies have announced substantial workforce reductions as part of broader strategic initiatives. Merck revealed plans to cut approximately 6,000 jobs globally, representing about 8% of its workforce, as part of a $3 billion cost-cutting program through 2027. The company aims to streamline operations while investing in key growth areas and promising scientific ventures.
Similarly, Bristol Myers Squibb is implementing an additional $2 billion in savings through 2027, building on its ongoing $1.5 billion cost reduction program. These measures have resulted in significant layoffs, including recent cuts of 516 employees in Lawrenceville, New Jersey, and the closure of a manufacturing plant in the Chicago suburbs.
Novartis is also trimming its workforce, with plans to lay off 427 employees at its U.S. headquarters in East Hanover, New Jersey. This follows earlier cuts of 330 employees related to site closures in Germany and Boston. The company continues to pursue strategic acquisitions while optimizing its existing operations.
Biotech Sector Faces Funding Challenges and Pipeline Adjustments
Smaller biotech companies are particularly feeling the pressure of the current market environment, with many forced to make difficult decisions regarding their workforce and research programs.
Intellia Therapeutics announced a 27% reduction in its workforce, affecting approximately 142 employees, as it refocuses on high-value programs in gene editing. The company is discontinuing development of its NTLA-3001 therapy for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency-associated lung disease to prioritize resources on more promising candidates.
In a more drastic move, IGM Biosciences revealed plans to cut 73% of its workforce, eliminating 100 positions, while halting development of two autoimmune drug candidates. The company is exploring strategic alternatives to maximize shareholder value in light of these significant changes.
Galapagos announced a major restructuring that will see the company split into two entities and reduce its workforce by 40%, affecting about 300 employees across its European operations. The reorganization aims to create a more focused innovative medicines specialist and a separate cell therapy company.
Clinical Setbacks and Pipeline Reprioritization
Several companies have been forced to make workforce reductions following disappointing clinical trial results or strategic pipeline decisions.
Allakos announced it will cut 75% of its employees and discontinue further development of its AK006 program following underwhelming Phase I results in chronic spontaneous urticaria. This leaves the company with only about 15 employees as it explores strategic alternatives.
Cargo Therapeutics disclosed plans to lay off approximately 50% of its workforce and discontinue a mid-stage study of its lead candidate following a strategic review. The company is now focusing on advancing its preclinical and research pipeline while evaluating potential partnerships.
These workforce changes reflect the ongoing challenges faced by the pharmaceutical and biotech industries as they adapt to evolving market conditions, regulatory landscapes, and scientific advancements. Companies are increasingly focused on optimizing their resources to support key programs and maintain financial stability in a competitive environment.
References
- Seres Therapeutics Cutting 25% of Workforce
Follow along as BioSpace tracks job cuts and restructuring initiatives throughout 2025.
Explore Further
What are the long-term financial implications for companies like Merck and Bristol Myers Squibb who are implementing extensive cost-cutting programs?
How have smaller biotech companies adjusted their research pipelines to balance funding constraints and workforce reductions?
What are the strategic goals behind Galapagos splitting into two entities and focusing on separate areas of expertise?
How do clinical trial setbacks, like those faced by Allakos, influence workforce restructuring in the biotech sector?
What trends or external pressures in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries are driving these widespread layoffs and restructuring efforts?